🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that smartphones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to approve a law raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a useful first step," stated the parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. One foundation set up by the family of a girl who was lost after viewing harmful platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, regulation is largely occurring at the state government level due to national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some figures to mimic the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Outside of these regions, additional states are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world agencies take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "could backfire". The organization points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this global conversation evolves, the actions of the Australian government and its followers indicate that states internationally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.